Skip to main content Scroll Top

EU, US, Canada, and UK sanction Chinese officials for human rights violations in Xinjiang

The European Union, the U.S., Canada and the U.K. imposed coor­di­nat­ed sanc­tions on top Chinese offi­cials for human rights vio­la­tions against the Uyghur minor­i­ty on Monday, trig­ger­ing Beijing to black­list sev­er­al EU politi­cians and academics.

The bloc accused the Chinese offi­cials of being “respon­si­ble for seri­ous human rights vio­la­tions in China, in par­tic­u­lar large-scale arbi­trary deten­tions inflict­ed upon Uyghurs and peo­ple from oth­er Muslim eth­nic minorities.”

The bloc’s top diplo­mats imposed trav­el bans and asset freezes on four senior Chinese offi­cials includ­ing Zhu Hailun, the for­mer deputy par­ty sec­re­tary in Xinjiang, and one of the archi­tects of the mass-deten­tion pro­gram, accord­ing to an inves­ti­ga­tion by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

This telegram is from the Communist Party com­mis­sion in charge of Xinjiang’s secu­ri­ty appa­ra­tus. The telegram, writ­ten in Chinese, is an oper­a­tions man­u­al for run­ning the mass deten­tion camps. It is marked “secret” and was approved by Zhu Hailun, then deputy sec­re­tary of Xinjiang’s Communist Party and the region’s top secu­ri­ty official.

The United Nations esti­mates that more than 1 mil­lion Uyghurs and mem­bers of oth­er Turkic minori­ties were detained in camps. The num­ber could be high­er than 2 mil­lion, accord­ing to a U.S. State Department official.

China’s Foreign Ministry react­ed to the EU sanc­tions by say­ing they “harm China’s sov­er­eign­ty” and are “based on noth­ing but lies and dis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­re­gards and dis­torts facts.”

Beijing then announced a trav­el ban against eight European politi­cians and two schol­ars from Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Lithuania and Sweden. It also barred their insti­tu­tions from doing busi­ness in China.

Dutch law­mak­er Sjoerd Sjoerdsma, one of the politi­cians tar­get­ed, invit­ed his European col­leagues to con­tin­ue to put pres­sure on China. “As long as China com­mits geno­cide on the Uyghurs, I will not remain silent,” he wrote on Twitter.

In sol­i­dar­i­ty with the bloc, the U.K. and Canada announced sim­i­lar sanc­tions on the four Chinese offi­cials and one com­pa­ny. The U.S. Treasury added two Xinjiang top offi­cials to the black­list of Chinese gov­ern­ment rep­re­sen­ta­tivesaccused of being involved with “seri­ous human rights abus­es.” (The U.S. black­list­ed Zhu and for­mer Xinjiang Public Security Bureau Director Wang Mingshan, also on the EU list, last year.)

We are unit­ed in call­ing for China to end its repres­sive prac­tices against Uyghur Muslims and mem­bers of oth­er eth­nic and reli­gious minor­i­ty groups in Xinjiang, and to release those arbi­trar­i­ly detained,” the three coun­tries’ for­eign min­istries said in a joint state­ment.

A rare move against a powerful country

This is the first time the EU has adopt­ed such mea­sures against China since the Tiananmen Square crack­down in 1989.

The EU for­eign min­is­ters first agreed on the sanc­tions last week after lengthy nego­ti­a­tions that exposed the bloc’s divi­sions on how to deal with China, an impor­tant busi­ness part­ner ー and com­peti­tor ー for many European coun­tries, accord­ing to observers.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán led oppo­si­tion against the sanc­tions, the Wall Street Journal report­ed.

Last week, China’s ambas­sador to the bloc Zhang Ming invit­ed the EU to recon­sid­er the deci­sion through the Twitter account of the Chinese mis­sion to the EU.

Sanctions are con­fronta­tion­al,” the Chinese Mission’s tweet reads. “We want dia­logue, not con­fronta­tion. We ask the EU side to think twice. If some insist on con­fronta­tion, we will not back down, as we have no options oth­er than ful­fill­ing our respon­si­bil­i­ties to the people.”

The EU deci­sion fol­lows a U.S. law autho­riz­ing sanc­tions last June against Chinese offi­cials deemed respon­si­ble for the use of indoc­tri­na­tion camps, forced labor, and intru­sive sur­veil­lance against eth­nic minori­ties in China’s west­ern Xinjiang region. The U.S. Commerce Department has also imposed trade restric­tions against more than 30 Chinese com­pa­nies for their role in the Xinjiang repression.

The World Uyghur Congress, a Germany-based group rep­re­sent­ing Uyghurs in exile, wel­comed the sanc­tions but urged the bloc not to bow to China’s pres­sure and main­tain a strong “human rights-based approach” when deal­ing with the pow­er­ful Asian country.

Only through con­crete action like this can we stop the Uyghur geno­cide and end the suf­fer­ing of the Uyghur peo­ple,” the group’s pres­i­dent Dolkun Isa said in a state­ment.

In recent years, reports by researchers and jour­nal­ists have doc­u­ment­ed instances of forced labor, fam­i­ly sep­a­ra­tion and the destruc­tion of mosques and oth­er reli­gious sites. Former detainees allege they were sub­ject­ed to indoc­tri­na­tion, sex­u­al­ly abused and forcibly ster­il­ized.

More recent­ly, a num­ber of coun­tries and par­lia­ments includ­ing the U.S., Canadaand the Netherlands have declared that China’s crack­down on the Muslim minori­ties amounts to “geno­cide” in vio­la­tion of the U.N. Genocide Convention. A recent report by more than 50 experts cit­ed China Cables find­ings as evi­dence sup­port­ing such allegations.

China has dis­missed the accu­sa­tions of geno­cide say­ing “it’s noth­ing but a rumor,” accord­ing to the Global Times, the Communist Party mouthpiece.

A group of Uyghur activists and lawyers filed a com­plaint last year with the International Criminal Court urg­ing the Hague pros­e­cu­tors to inves­ti­gate Beijing’s actions against the eth­nic groups. But the court decid­ed it won’t pur­sue the investigation.

The EU sanc­tions imposed against the Chinese offi­cials are part of a wider list that also includes offi­cials from Russia, Libya, South Sudan, and North Korea under the bloc’s new human rights sanc­tions regime.

Scilla Alecci, ICIJ

Related Posts