Scroll Top

The ENABLERS Act Blocked by US Senate

On December 7, 2022, the US Senate vot­ed not to include the Establishing New Authorities for Businesses Laundering and Enabling Risks to Security (ENABLERS) Act in the 2023 defense bud­get. Initially intro­duced by a group of bipar­ti­san law­mak­ers fol­low­ing the release of the Pandora Papers, the ENABLERS Act had been includ­ed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) ear­li­er in 2022.

Responding to ques­tions sent to Republican Senator Patrick Toomey, a Republican aide on the bank­ing com­mit­tee said the ENABLERS Act should go through reg­u­lar leg­isla­tive process­es instead of being “tacked on” to a fund­ing bill.

The ENABLERS Act

Passed by the US House of Representatives in July 2022, the ENABLERS Act intends to close exist­ing loop­holes used by klep­to­crats by extend­ing anti-mon­ey laun­der­ing (AML) require­ments in the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) to include pro­fes­sion­al ser­vice providers, or “gate­keep­ers.” 

Under this amend­ment, new­ly cov­ered enti­ties, such as accoun­tants, lawyers, and third-par­ty pay­ment ser­vices, would be required to:

  • Identify and ver­i­fy account hold­ers, includ­ing estab­lish­ing and main­tain­ing writ­ten pro­ce­dures that are rea­son­ably designed to iden­ti­fy and ver­i­fy ben­e­fi­cial own­er­ship structures
  • Maintain appro­pri­ate pro­ce­dures to guard against cor­rup­tion, mon­ey laun­der­ing, the financ­ing of ter­ror­ism, or oth­er forms of illic­it finance
  • Establish due dili­gence poli­cies, pro­ce­dures, and con­trols as described in the BSA
  • Establish AML programs
  • Report sus­pi­cious transactions

Gatekeeper Opposition

Voicing its oppo­si­tion to the Act, the American Bar Association (ABA) said that the amend­ment could result in lawyers being required to report attor­ney-client priv­i­leged and oth­er pro­tect­ed client infor­ma­tion to the gov­ern­ment. However, the Caucus Against Foreign Corruption and Kleptocracy stat­ed the amend­ment would not vio­late attor­ney-client priv­i­lege, cit­ing the ABA’s guide­lines that already allow and encour­age attor­neys to report sus­pi­cions of crim­i­nal activ­i­ty under a vol­un­tary framework.

Having sent a let­ter of con­cern to Senate lead­ers in July, on October 5, ABA President Deborah Enix-Ross sent a fur­ther let­ter urg­ing the Senate to oppose the ENABLERS Act amend­ment and its inclu­sion in the NDAA for the fol­low­ing reasons:

  • The amend­ment has not been sub­ject to a hear­ing or markup, as required by fed­er­al and state law, due to the extent of its poten­tial impact on “per­haps most lawyers in the US”
  • The amend­ment would impede exist­ing efforts to com­bat mon­ey laun­der­ing and ter­ror­ist financing
  • Requiring lawyers to sub­mit sus­pi­cious activ­i­ty reports (SARs) on their clients’ finan­cial trans­ac­tions would con­flict with their eth­i­cal oblig­a­tions and under­mine the fun­da­men­tal legal prin­ci­ples of con­fi­den­tial­i­ty and attor­ney-client priv­i­lege that “have been cen­tral to the American legal sys­tem for centuries”

Key Takeaways

While the ENABLERS Act has not been signed into law at this time, firms should be aware that the leg­is­la­tion could still be includ­ed in the government’s omnibus spend­ing bill for 2023, the dead­line for which is December 16th. Failing this, the Act may be resub­mit­ted next year as a stand­alone bill. 

This arti­cle first appeared at Comply Advantage

Originally pub­lished 14 December 2022, updat­ed 22 August 2024

H.R.5525 — ENABLERS Act