On January 26 and 27, the secÂond round of the Czech presÂiÂdenÂtial elecÂtion takes place, with MiloĆĄ Zeman, the incumÂbent and a known supÂportÂer of Vladimir Putin, supÂposÂedÂly leadÂing the race. As The Insider found out, his symÂpaÂthies could be jusÂtiÂfied by his involveÂment in a major corÂrupÂtion scheme perÂtainÂing to the repayÂment of Russiaâs fedÂerÂal debt to the Czech Republic through shady go-between comÂpaÂnies. The Lithuanian law enforceÂment has charged one of the interÂmeÂdiÂaries, Falkon Capital, with conÂnecÂtions to orgaÂnized crime and the Russian intelÂliÂgence, which conÂtributed to the Lithuanian presÂiÂdenÂtâs impeachÂment. The comÂpaÂny also took part in doubtÂful bankÂruptÂcy schemes that underÂmined the conÂstrucÂtion of windÂmills in Kalmykia, Russia. The Insider spoke to a direct parÂticÂiÂpant of the corÂrupÂtion deal with the Czech Republic and found out: the resultÂing profÂits had been disÂtribÂuted between the Czech presÂiÂdent and the Russian parÂty, nameÂly Anatoly Chubais and Alexei Kudrin.
Chubaisâ peculiar agreement
During his meetÂing with Putin in Sochi at the end of last year, MiloĆĄ Zeman made such loud decÂlaÂraÂtions as «Ukraine has forÂgotÂten its hisÂtoÂry» and «Czechia needs Russia more than it needs the EU.» Previously, he had admitÂted the posÂsiÂbilÂiÂty of a refÂerÂenÂdum on the Republicâs exit from the EU and the NATO, referred to Russiaâs annexÂaÂtion of Crimea as a «fait accomÂpli,» and sugÂgestÂed that Ukraine conÂsidÂer setÂtling for «reimÂburseÂment in cash or oil and gas shipÂments.» Zeman had also repeatÂedÂly demandÂed that the EU lift the sancÂtions imposed on Russia (although the matÂter is out of his jurisÂdicÂtion, with Czechia being a parÂliaÂmenÂtary republic).
The forÂmer Czech presÂiÂdent, VĂĄclav Klaus, seems to have takÂen Zemanâs cue. In January 2015, he indulged Putinâs ears with a numÂber of stateÂments on the Ukrainian issue. Thus, Klaus said that Ukraine was likeÂly to repeat «the posÂiÂtive sceÂnario of the Dissolution of Czechoslovakia,» that Russia was not wagÂing a war in Ukraine, that Ukraine was a failed state, and Crimea had always been a part of Russia.
Klaus is a long-time acquainÂtance of Anatoly Chubais, Russian politiÂcian and enerÂgy tycoon. In 2014, Chubais postÂed two tweets from his offiÂcial (now deletÂed) account: «My old comÂrade VĂĄclav Klaus, forÂmer Czech presÂiÂdent, has sent me a link to his artiÂcle on Ukraine,» and «I could probÂaÂbly chalÂlenge some of his points, but no one can blame him of being superÂfiÂcial or parÂtial. Iâve finÂished his artiÂcle â a fasÂciÂnatÂing read. Highly recÂomÂmendÂed!» In his «imparÂtial» artiÂcle, Klaus mainÂtains, among othÂer things, that «the modÂern-day Ukraine is a lamÂenÂtaÂble legaÂcy of Stalinâs time, when peoÂples were uprootÂed and borÂders torn down» and that «Ukraine has no hisÂtorÂiÂcal traÂdiÂtion of stateÂhood.» Calling the Euromaidan «a Kiev Putsch,» he also prophÂeÂsies the impendÂing disÂsoÂluÂtion of the country.
Zeman and Klaus belong to the scarce group of European digÂniÂtaries who openÂly, in no uncerÂtain terms express their supÂport of Putin. Among European leadÂers, only Viktor OrbĂĄn shares their senÂtiÂment. The Insider has already explained OrbĂĄnâs parÂtialÂiÂty by the monÂey Russian crime lord Semion Mogilevich paid to the politiÂcian and his parÂty. It has now become apparÂent that the reaÂson behind Zemanâs and Klausâ revÂerÂence for Putinâs poliÂcies may be just as trivÂial, although in their case, the monÂey could have been proÂvidÂed through fedÂerÂal chanÂnels with the assisÂtance of none othÂer than Anatoly Chubais, forÂmer head of RAO UES (Unified Energy Systems of Russia) and curÂrent chairÂman of the execÂuÂtive board at Rusnano.
Back in 1999, Zeman had not yet been electÂed President; howÂevÂer, as Prime Minister, he was the head of state. Zemanâs govÂernÂment struck a bafÂfling deal on the parÂtial setÂtleÂment of the USSRâs debt to Czechoslovakia (transÂformed into Russiaâs debt to the Czech Republic after the two unions colÂlapsed) to the amount of $3 bn. The young European state did not hold out mush hope that Russia would priÂorÂiÂtize this debt anyÂtime soon. Nevertheless, in 1999, the Czech govÂernÂment was offered a scheme of payÂments through interÂmeÂdiÂaries â a preÂviÂousÂly unknown Czech comÂpaÂny Falkon Capital on the Czech side and RAO UES on the Russian side.
Both the Czech and the Russian media viewed the deal as corÂrupt. Czech media brought up the inciÂdent durÂing MiloĆĄ Zemanâs recent elecÂtion camÂpaign, emphaÂsizÂing that the deal had been invesÂtiÂgatÂed by the Czech intelÂliÂgence, and yet its details had nevÂer been disÂclosed in full. In Russia, the deal entered the spotÂlight in the earÂly 2000s, when Novaya Gazeta, Kommersant, and Vedomosti dropped hints of posÂsiÂble embezÂzleÂment â albeit withÂout any direct evidence.
The deal was a curiÂous one indeed. Paying a mere $400 mln to the Czech govÂernÂment, Falkon Capital effecÂtiveÂly purÂchased Russiaâs three-bilÂlion-dolÂlar debt. The plan was to setÂtle the debt through barter deals, with RAO UES supÂplyÂing enerÂgy to third counÂtries. However, as earÂly as in 2001, Falkon yieldÂed the debt to RAO UES itself. On September 13, 2001, Anatoly Chubais, chairÂman of the execÂuÂtive board of RAO UES, writes a letÂter to Alexei Kudrin, Russian minÂisÂter of finance (The Insiderhas been proÂvidÂed a copy of said letÂter), requestÂing that his minÂistry pay $1.3 bn to Falkon Capital and $1.35 bn to RAO UES «in reimÂburseÂment.» Under the same deal, Inter-RAO (a RAO UES subÂsidiary) began supÂplyÂing enerÂgy to Belarus (which resultÂed in a crimÂiÂnal case â read on for details) and to Ukraine.


The Insider conÂtactÂed an eye witÂness of the earÂly stages of the deal â busiÂnessÂman Vladislav Moskalev, who also feaÂtured in our stoÂry on underÂhandÂed financÂing of Alexei Uchitelâs notoÂriÂous movie Matilda (in Russian). At present, Moskalev resides in Canada (which refused to extraÂdite him to Russia), but back in 1999, he was at the cenÂter of events.
Tennis and the «Debt Settler Club»: Talks with Kasyanov and Kudrin
According to Vladislav Moskalev, in the 1990s, he was a memÂber of Bolshaya Shlyapa («The Big Hat»), an elite tenÂnis club that orgaÂnized tourÂnaÂments for govÂernÂment offiÂcials and top-tier busiÂnessÂmen. Its orgaÂnizÂer, banker Yarosav Kalagursky, introÂduced him to Paata Mamaladze, the founder of the aforeÂmenÂtioned Falkon Capital. (As Kalagursky told The Insider, he could not recall the sequence of introductions).
Background inforÂmaÂtion:
According to the Czech comÂmerÂcial regÂisÂter, Falkon Capital was foundÂed in Prague in 1995 by Paata Mamaladze and a group of ex-Soviet nationÂals. It was not long before the founders disÂsolved into thin air, to be replaced by Slovakian nationÂal Josef Äimbora, who became the new CEO. The curÂrent manÂageÂment of the comÂpaÂny includes David Mamaladze, born in 1986, and Czech nationÂal Karel HlavĂĄÄek.
«Foreign debts attract entreÂpreÂneurs like a magÂnet. Discounts may vary from 10 to 80 perÂcent,» explains Moskalev. It was not Mamaladzeâs first attempt at the trade: he had already tried to skim monÂey off the resetÂtleÂment of Libyaâs debt to Czechia. âWhen Kalagursky revealed that Mamaladze was operÂatÂing through the Czech Ministry of Finance, I took an interÂest to it too.â
According to Moskalev, quite a few busiÂnessÂmen were lookÂing to purÂchase Russiaâs debt to Czechia, but offers of setÂtleÂment with timÂber and oil shipÂments had been rejected:
«I was the one to sugÂgest the posÂsiÂbilÂiÂty of setÂtling Russiaâs debt to the Czech Republic with enerÂgy supÂplies, notwithÂstandÂing the fact that the credÂiÂtor proÂduced its own enerÂgy in abunÂdance. My friend Oleg Sysuyev, who had just resigned from the Presidential Administration, arranged my meetÂing with the then Minister of Finance, Mikhail Kasyanov,» recalls Moskalev. Currently senior vice chairÂman of the board of direcÂtors at Alfa Bank, Oleg Sysuyev conÂfirmed that he had met Moskalev at the Big Hat tenÂnis club, where they had even won a team tourÂnaÂment once, but he did not shed any light on the cirÂcumÂstances of Russiaâs debt repayÂment to Czechia because «he has nevÂer been involved in forÂeign debt settlement.»
Moskalev offers the folÂlowÂing account of the subÂseÂquent negotiations:
âSysuyev and I sit down with Kasyanov. âSo, what have you got?â he asks with a polite smile. I say: âForeign debt, Czech Republic. Shall we setÂtle it?â He says, âHow do we go about it?â I say, âWith enerÂgy supÂplies.â Kasyanov was the first to show immeÂdiÂate interÂest, withÂout any stuÂpid quesÂtions like âWhy would Czechia want our enerÂgy?â Five minÂutes into our conÂverÂsaÂtion, he says âAll right, letâs give it a go.â He asked us to proÂcure a letÂter from RAO UES to conÂfirm that the comÂpaÂny was âwillÂing to parÂticÂiÂpate in the setÂtleÂment of Russiaâs debt to the Czech Republic with enerÂgy supÂplies.â The recipÂiÂent of said supÂplies was conÂveÂnientÂly omitÂted, and when the deal came into force, the enerÂgy was supÂplied to Belarus and Ukraine.â
According to Moskalev, Kasyanov wantÂed the letÂter to be «conÂvincÂing, at least two pages long» because he would have to present it to the Czech Ministry of Finance, but he was in for a disappointment.
«At the time, RAO UESâ signÂing offiÂcers were Chubais and Alexei Kudrin, his finance deputy. Sysuyev did his best to put me through to Kudrin, but the man was always busy. So I approached Kudrin through Alfred Kokh instead, as we had a numÂber of comÂmon acquainÂtances. Sysuyev asked him for a meetÂing on my behalf. Koch had already resigned from the govÂernÂment and was workÂing on a new founÂdaÂtion with his friend Arkady Yevstafyev in Gazetny Alley, so I came to see him at his office. Together, we drove to the premisÂes of RAO UES in Kitay-gorod, Moscow. Kokh and Yevstafyev entered Kudrinâs office, while I stayed in the lobÂby. We had preÂpared the letÂter in advance to save time.
Some 20 minÂutes latÂer, Kokh and Yevstafyev reapÂpear with morose faces: âHe refused to sign it.â I ask them: âHow so?â They reply: âHe said he was out of his depth with it.â To think that he became the Minister of Finance a couÂple months latÂer! I say: âAsk Kudrinâs secÂreÂtary to type a sinÂgle senÂtence: âRAO UES of Russia seeks to parÂticÂiÂpate in the setÂtleÂment of Russiaâs exterÂnal debt to the Czech Republic to the amount of $3 bn.â What if simÂple lanÂguage makes him more amenable? They pop into his office for a couÂple more minÂutes and then return with his sigÂnaÂture on the letÂter. I take it back to the Ministry of Finance, where Kasyanov asks me: âHave you brought the letÂter?â âI have.â âLet me see.â He looks at it, makes no comÂment, but gives me a heartÂfelt smile. The Czech Ministry of Finance was notiÂfied about the new option of Russiaâs debt setÂtleÂment. The next step was a conÂtract between RAO UES and the comÂpaÂny appointÂed by the Czech minÂistry as the debt conÂtroller â Falkon Capital.»
«I used my cell as the number of the agreement.»
Whereas Falkonâs docÂuÂments were signed by Josef Äimbora, the comÂpaÂny was in fact run by Paato Mamaladze, says Moskalev. «When Mamaladze realÂized that the deal was on the table, he finalÂly set up an office for his comÂpaÂny â preÂviÂousÂly, Falkon had operÂatÂed withÂout one. By the time the agreeÂment was drawn up, Kasyanov had already yieldÂed his post to Kudrin and become Prime Minister. Kudrinâs posiÂtion in RAO UES had been takÂen by anothÂer Chubaisâ finance deputy, Anatoly Zelinsky. We negoÂtiÂatÂed the terms of the agreeÂment for about a week. My posiÂtion was that the Ministry of Finance should pay $5 mln to RAO UES in advance. Zelinsky reportÂed it to Chubais, who said: âGo on then.â After our fourth or fifth meetÂing, Zelinsky said, âYouâll have my sigÂnaÂture by ten tomorÂrow,â and I relayed the good news to Mamaladze. However, on the folÂlowÂing day, he says, âI canât sign it; Iâm scared.â That was when my jaw dropped for the secÂond time. I spent two hours reasÂsurÂing him â and he begrudgÂingÂly signed it, sayÂing, âIâm simÂply tired; letâs see how it goes,â» recalls Moskalev.
According to him, Alfred Kokh sudÂdenÂly showed interÂest in the deal as well. «I left RAO UES and went to the airÂport to catch a plane to Prague, but Kokh held me up. He sugÂgestÂed that Andrei Rappoport should sign the agreeÂment instead (Rappoport was a signÂing offiÂcer as well). As I saw it, Kokh and Rappoport were tryÂing to steal the show. Kokh even said things like, âVladislav, who do you think you are?â However, we already had Zelinskyâs sigÂnaÂtures on the papers, and they were left out of the deal.»
Moskalev says he subÂmitÂted the signed agreeÂment to Mamaladze, and the Czech Ministry of Finance regÂisÂtered it on the folÂlowÂing day. âAbout six or eight months after all the approvals were givÂen, the first payÂments under the agreeÂment were made. By then, RAO UES had appointÂed a subÂsidiary, Inter-RAO, to act on its behalf under the agreeÂment. At the time of the deal, Inter-RAO occuÂpied a one-room office at the Morskoi Dom busiÂness cenÂter near the Moscow City Duma. Mamaladze nevÂer came to Russia, but his repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtives at first expressed their surÂprise that such a major agreeÂment was being manÂaged by a tiny comÂpaÂny, to which I respondÂed, «Youâre the ones to talk.» Indeed, Falkonâs webÂsite does not even feaÂture a teleÂphone numÂber or an email.
According to Moskalev, he was douÂble-crossed: âA year latÂer, Zelinsky resigned, yieldÂing his posiÂtion to Leonid Melamed, who took over the Czech deal. <The Insiderâs note: Melamed has been under home arrest since 2015 on charges of a major embezÂzleÂment at Rusnano.> Unlike othÂers, Melamed had no trouÂble siphonÂing off funds to interÂmeÂdiÂary comÂpaÂnies withÂout my assisÂtance. Eventually, they got rid of me, with a negÂliÂgiÂble exit packÂage, which Melamed had posÂsiÂbly proÂcured from his perÂsonÂal funds â just enough for a few meals at the restauÂrant. It was far from what we had agreed upon, but I had been aware of the risks, as I had not signed any papers with them. So I said to myself: âAll right, they have my numÂber if they change their minds.â Any disÂplays of outÂrage would have been futile. Sysuyev had already quit the Presidential Administration for Alfa Bank, so there was no one to stand up for me. Besides â speakÂing of my numÂber â I used it as the numÂber of the agreeÂment, as hidÂden eviÂdence of my parÂticÂiÂpaÂtion in the deal. That is, the frameÂwork agreeÂment was regÂisÂtered by the Czech Ministry of Finance under the numÂber of my cell phone at the time: #1017/1755 of July 28, 1999.
The Insider made an inquiry to the Czech Ministry of Finance as to the exisÂtence of the relÂeÂvant entry in their regÂisÂter, but the Ministry « failed to find an agreeÂment with the indiÂcatÂed numÂber.» Similarly, the Czech authorÂiÂties refused to proÂvide any comÂment on Falkonâs dealÂings to Vedomosti in 2004. «This comÂpaÂny [Falkon] is not quite ordiÂnary,» said the spokesperÂson of the Czech minÂistry. «We sugÂgest that you refer to them directÂly for furÂther details.»
âA few days after the agreeÂment was signed, Zelensky sudÂdenÂly calls me: âVladislav, we need monÂey. Itâs for Chubais.â I felt like laughÂing out loud â such matÂters are disÂcussed from the get-go. What is more, it was apparÂent that the monÂey was for his perÂsonÂal needs, as the amount was modÂerÂate â around $150,000 â and the Ministry of Finance had not paid the advance yet. I had to explain that, as a comÂmerÂcial entiÂty, RAO UES could conÂclude a conÂsultÂing serÂvices agreeÂment with a third-parÂty comÂpaÂny with the forÂmal objecÂtive of findÂing debt setÂtleÂment partÂners (that is, Falkon Capital). The resultÂing docÂuÂment was Agency Contract #1âChR of July 22, 1999.
Article 4 of the Contract (studÂied by The Insider) reads as folÂlows: «The Principal (RAO UES of Russia) shall pay the Agent (Yukom-Libero) 3 perÂcent of the amount received from the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation for the supÂplies, as a result of perÂformÂing its obligÂaÂtions under each of the supÂply conÂtracts conÂcludÂed as agreed upon with the Agent, or 3 perÂcent of the amount of debt relief or debt swap against RAOâs schedÂuled or overÂdue payÂments proÂvidÂed to the Principal by the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation.»
According to the act of accepÂtance, Yucom-Libero has allegedÂly proÂvidÂed the folÂlowÂing serÂvices: «The Agent has conÂductÂed negoÂtiÂaÂtions with the Czech parÂty â the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic and its authoÂrized repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtive, Falkon Capital; secured their conÂsent to accept enerÂgy supÂplies as payÂments on Russiaâs forÂeign debt; preÂpared the agreeÂment between RAO UES of Russia and Falkon Capital; and facilÂiÂtatÂed the signÂing whereÂof on July 28, 1999, under numÂber 1017/1755,» and so on. According to Moskalev, Anatoly Zelinsky received a one-time bonus for the project to the amount of $144,000.


In 2001, Yucom-Libero Finanz- und Handels Aktiengesellschaft (Liechtenstein) â Yucom-Libero for short â becomes an offiÂcial co-ownÂer of Falkon. Neither Chubais nor Kudrin has proÂvidÂed any comÂment to The Insider.
Distribution of profits: «Consulting services» and Zemanâs share
Since the Falkon deal was interÂgovÂernÂmenÂtal, it could not have been conÂcludÂed withÂout Zemanâs approval. In the Czech Ministry of Finance, the deal is said to have been lobÂbied by ZdenÄk RachaÄ, forÂmer adviÂsor to VĂĄclav Klaus who was in charge of the Soviet (latÂer Russiaâs) exterÂnal debt to the Czech Republic. As for Klaus, from 1998 to 2002, he occuÂpied the post of Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies.
RachaÄâs efforts were duly rewardÂed: he was includÂed in the board of direcÂtors of Falkon Capital on May 23, 2012, where he stayed up to the end of 2017, accordÂing to the Czech comÂmerÂcial regÂisÂter. In addiÂtion, RachaÄ is a memÂber of the superÂviÂsoÂry board of Hotel Praha a.s. â the legal entiÂty in charge of Hotel Praha, one of Falkonâs propÂerÂties with David Mamaladze (Paata Mamaladzeâs brothÂer) on the board of direcÂtors. Interestingly, Falkon Capitalâs board of direcÂtors once feaÂtured TomĂĄĆĄ ChĆoupek, the son of forÂmer Czechoslovak minÂisÂter of forÂeign affairs.
The Czech Ministry of Finance has refrained from any comÂment on the coinÂciÂdences. Moskalev is cerÂtain that Kudrin and Zelinsky were not left in the dust either. «I once accomÂpaÂnied Zelinsky on his trip to Prague, and latÂer he brought Kudrin there. Zelensky had a small share of the profÂits, while Kudrinâs share was more than fair. I donât have any papers to conÂfirm it because I was quickÂly squeezed out of the deal, but this was what Inter-RAO employÂees told me. While Zelinsky got paid for introÂducÂing Kudrin to Falkon, Kasyanov got nothing.»
Contracts with Falkon Capital regardÂing the outÂstandÂing debt to Czechia were signed even after Mikhail Kasyanov was disÂmissed from the post of Prime Minister, when «only a handÂful of offiÂcials were privy to the intriÂcaÂcies of our debt setÂtleÂment process.» According to Vladislav Moskalev, at least $2 bn was earned on disÂcounts, and the remainÂing bilÂlion covÂered the actuÂal enerÂgy supÂplies to Belarus and Ukraine. «The Ministry of Finance paid $1.15 to Falkon, while it was comÂmon knowlÂedge that the Czech state was only getÂting $400,000.
The remainÂing $700,000 had already been disÂtribÂuted among the parÂticÂiÂpants: like Melamed and Chubais, each of them had a share. As Mamaladzeâs employÂee told me, Chubais transÂferred a share of the disÂcount revÂenue to Zeman â both in bank transÂfers and in cash. Presumably, that was when Zeman got on the Russian hook.»
The remainÂing $1.3 bn was approÂpriÂatÂed by RAO UES and Inter-RAO. (Besides, enerÂgy supÂplies to Belarus under the «Czech debt setÂtleÂment agreeÂment» resultÂed in a crimÂiÂnal case â see below.)
The Insiderâs source, who worked in the Presidential Administration at the time of the deal, recalls: «The deal was reportÂed to Putin; he was expectÂed to act on it. However, all he did was nod at Kasyanov, who refrained from any action against Kudrin, his minÂisÂter of finance.» Nevertheless, as our source preÂsumes, Anatoly Chubais could have been dealt with â behind closed doors.
«Around 2005, a mid-rankÂing FSS offiÂcer approached me,» says Vladislav Moskalev. «He was lookÂing for incrimÂiÂnatÂing eviÂdence on Chubaisâ involveÂment in the Czech deal. In the meanÂtime, Izvestia authors startÂed bringÂing up Falkon Capital again. Apparently, the FSS learned about the deal and were outÂraged at havÂing been left out. Considering that the scanÂdal was swept under the rug, Chubais must have reached an agreeÂment with them. Hereâs a stoÂry to illusÂtrate his close relaÂtionÂship with Putin. In 2001, I dropped by Anatoly Zelinskyâs office for yet anothÂer round of Czech deal negoÂtiÂaÂtions. Zelinsky waved me off: âWeâre in the midÂdle of someÂthing here â they need a bilÂlion for Chechnya.â Thatâs the kind of quoÂtas they had.»
For a while, Falkon was also co-owned by Zeev Ofer, says the Czech comÂmerÂcial regÂisÂter. Moskalev claims to have known him as Vladimir Ofer; he also says the man now lives in an elite gatÂed comÂmuÂniÂty near Moscow. (On Facebook, howÂevÂer, Ofer has statÂed Prague as his place of resÂiÂdence. Notably, his list of Facebook friends includes Alexei Kudrin.) «Mamaladze claims to have hired him as an envoy to Russia, as he was not allowed into the counÂtry back then. Ofer sugÂgestÂed that I get an Austrian passÂport â he said he had the right conÂnecÂtions. As I underÂstand, Kudrin and his wife received simÂiÂlar offers.»
The inforÂmaÂtion is indiÂrectÂly conÂfirmed by pubÂliÂcaÂtions on Evgeny Dodâs case â anothÂer parÂticÂiÂpant of the Falkon deal and top manÂagÂer at RAO UES at the time. When he was detained in 2016 on the charges of embezÂzleÂment at RusHydro (which he headÂed from 2009 to 2015), the police disÂcovÂered that he had a Czech resÂiÂdence perÂmit. Moreover, his wife Ekaterina had opened an account in a Czech bank, where Zeev Ofer had wired âŹ100,000 from his account in Liechtenstein. Ekaterina had transÂferred the amount to Malta as a deposit to strengthÂen her Maltese citÂiÂzenÂship application.
«Milking» Belarus
Energy supÂplies to Belarus and Ukraine were not entireÂly lawÂful either. Belarus iniÂtiÂatÂed a crimÂiÂnal case against Northern Products, a comÂpaÂny that had purÂchased Belenergoâs two-milÂlion-dolÂlar debt for the supÂplied enerÂgy from Falkon; howÂevÂer, after the bilatÂerÂal clearÂing, it had transÂferred a conÂsidÂerÂably smallÂer amount to Falkonâs account. The invesÂtiÂgaÂtion conÂcludÂed that the repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtive of Northern Products Ltd had «conÂductÂed illeÂgal busiÂness activÂiÂties of parÂticÂuÂlarÂly large scale.»
Valery Dashkevich of Independent Institute of Socio-Economic and Political Studies, Minsk, offered the folÂlowÂing interÂpreÂtaÂtion to Vedomosti: RAO UES was sellÂing enerÂgy to Belenergo through Falkon, but Belenergo was perÂmaÂnentÂly indebtÂed to the latÂter because conÂsumÂing enterÂprisÂes were behind on their payÂments. Intermediaries would buy Belenergoâs debts from Falkon with disÂcounts. Falkon would yield the proÂceeds to the Czech state budÂget, while the interÂmeÂdiÂaries would accept prodÂucts manÂuÂfacÂtured by Belorussian enterÂprisÂes as payÂment and sell them with a 200-perÂcent return. «Enterprises would sign an act with Belenergo; the proÂceÂdure was called âenerÂgy offÂset,â» says Dashkevich. In 2004, RAO UES and Inter-RAO supÂplied Belarus with enerÂgy through this scheme to the amount of $80 mln and $71 mln, respectively.
Windmills in Kalmykia and St. Petersburg
In the 1990s, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, presÂiÂdent of Kalmykia (conÂstituent of Russia), promised to build a «wind park» in the repubÂlic. Two windÂmills were erectÂed. They served priÂmarÂiÂly as a tourist attracÂtion and evenÂtuÂalÂly fell apart. However, the comÂmitÂment has been reafÂfirmed durÂing Alexei Orlovâs term. The comÂpaÂny that underÂtook to delivÂer on the promisÂes was the infaÂmous Falkon Capital, with a total of 13 windÂmills in the works. In 2012, Paata Mamaladze visÂitÂed Kalmykia to study a «parÂticÂuÂlarÂly promisÂing investÂment opporÂtuÂniÂty.» However, they built two windÂmills again and called it a day. Falkon Capital claims to have spent $26 milÂlion from its own funds.
Bad luck with wind enerÂgy did nothÂing to deter Falkon Capital. The Czechs foundÂed Kalmykian Energy Company (KEC OJSC), a straw comÂpaÂny that skimmed monÂey off enerÂgy supÂplies to resÂiÂdents of Elista, the Kalmykian capÂiÂtal. Further on, Falkon Capital estabÂlished Alten, a Kalmykian entiÂty headÂed by David Mamaladze, which bought 94 perÂcent of the KEC. KEC does not proÂduce enerÂgy; it is supÂpled by Kalmenergo â an affilÂiÂate of Interregional Distribution Grid Company of the South (IDGC of the South, JSC). Another local entiÂty, Kalmenergosbyt colÂlects elecÂtricÂiÂty bill payÂments from indiÂvidÂuÂals and transÂfers them to KEC. KEC keeps its mediÂaÂtorâs fee and transÂfers the rest to Kalmenergo in payÂment for the supÂplied enerÂgy. However, when KECâs debt to Kalmenergo exceedÂed 700 mln rubles ($12.5 mln), Kalmenergo appealed to the Commercial Court of Kalmykia, and KEC â Falkonâs subÂsidiary â was declared bankÂrupt. Now KEC is run by a bankÂruptÂcy adminÂisÂtraÂtion. (The Insider has explained the scheme of debt evaÂsion through bankÂruptÂcy of a straw comÂpaÂny on the examÂple of Gazprom.)
However, bankÂruptÂcy in Kalmykia did nothÂing to impede Falkon Capitalâs expanÂsion in Russia. The Governor of St. Petersburg took an interÂest in their serÂvices. On June 2, 2017, the city of St. Petersburg and Falkon Capital signed a letÂter of intent at St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. The agreeÂment was signed by the Governor himÂself, Georgy Poltavchenko, and Sergo Mamaladze, vice chairÂman of the execÂuÂtive board of Falkon Capital. «The Czech entreÂpreÂneurs» promised to proÂvide St. Petersburg with windÂmills by 2024 for 1 bn rubles, says the webÂsite of St. Petersburg City Administration.
Falkonâs links to the Russian mafia and intelligence
In October 2003, the State Security Department of Lithuania (VSD) subÂmitÂted docÂuÂments tesÂtiÂfyÂing to the «interÂnaÂtionÂal orgaÂnized crime conÂnecÂtions of President Rolandas Paksasâ inner cirÂcle» to the leadÂerÂship of Seimas, the Lithuanian parÂliaÂment. Among othÂer vioÂlaÂtions, Paksas was charged with under-the-table negoÂtiÂaÂtions with Falkon Capital.
«A numÂber of indiÂvidÂuÂals directÂly linked to the Russian intelÂliÂgence and interÂnaÂtionÂal orgaÂnized crime groups seek to priÂvaÂtize Lithuanian ecoÂnomÂic entiÂties of strateÂgic valÂue. Notably, Falkon Capital a.s., a Czech legal entiÂty directÂly involved in the financÂing of interÂnaÂtionÂal terÂrorÂists, intends to parÂticÂiÂpate in the priÂvaÂtiÂzaÂtion of the Mazeikiu Elektrine powÂer plant,» says the VSD report. On December 1, 2003, a speÂcial comÂmisÂsion of the Seimas conÂcludÂed that Paksas could be «under the influÂence of cerÂtain indiÂvidÂuÂals,» which «posÂes a threat to the nationÂal secuÂriÂty,» and Paksas was impeached. «They nevÂer went through with the priÂvaÂtiÂzaÂtion. Falkon Capital even declared their intent to litÂiÂgate, but to no avail,» recalls Lithuanian politÂiÂcal observÂer Marius LaurinaviÄius.
David Mamaladze, memÂber of the board of direcÂtors at Falkon Capital up to November 2017, had headÂed the Presidential Protocol of Eduard Shevardnadze, ex-Soviet forÂeign minÂisÂter and secÂond Georgian presÂiÂdent. In a 2008 interÂview to Idnes, David Mamaladze statÂed that Paata «does not speak to anyÂone, let alone jourÂnalÂists» and curÂrentÂly engages in «oil trade, among othÂer things.»
According to Nino Nakashidze, ex-Geogian ambasÂsador to Prague, «Paata has no conÂnecÂtions with Georgia or Georgians. He lives in Switzerland and assoÂciates mostÂly with Russians; his wife is Russian too.» The Insiderâs source in Georgia also preÂsumes that Mamaladze «has conÂnecÂtions in the Russian milÂiÂtary and was a KGB serÂviceÂman» back in the Soviet times. Quoting Salome Zurabishvili, ex-forÂeign minÂisÂter of Georgia, as their source, a numÂber of media have reportÂed that Falkon Capital is actuÂalÂly owned by «ex-GRU offiÂcer Paata Mamaladze and a group of Russian busiÂnessÂmen includÂing Anatoly Chubais.» However, as Zurabishvili points out to The Insider, «there is no speÂcifÂic data on Mamaladze.»
With refÂerÂence to Salome Zurabishvili, ex-forÂeign minÂisÂter of Georgia, a numÂber of media have reportÂed that Falkon Capital is actuÂalÂly owned by «ex-GRU offiÂcer Paata Mamaladze and a group of Russian busiÂnessÂmen includÂing Anatoly Chubais.»
«Paata Mamaladze was clearÂly at odds with the law in Georgia; as I underÂstand, this was the reaÂson why he couldÂnât even visÂit Moscow in the 2000s. However, his recent appearÂance in Kalmykia may sigÂniÂfy that he has been parÂdoned. It is true that heâs spent a lot of time in Schafhausen, Switzerland, as he has a friend there,» says Vladislav Moskalev.
As to why Russian authorÂiÂties have parÂdoned Mamaladze, our guess is as good as yours. Besides, Falkon Capital has announced at its webÂsite that it has installed a solar powÂer staÂtion on Mount Athos (some media claim the comÂpaÂny has even built a church there). Mount Athos is a covÂetÂed desÂtiÂnaÂtion not only for Orthodox Christian pilÂgrims but also for Putinâs inner cirÂcle. However, this could be a mere coincidence.
Putinâs Czech and Mate: How Moscow bought the Czech presÂiÂdenÂtâs affection




